Washington: The US administration on June 13 announced relaxed pollution standards
for utilities upgrading old power plants, a move that immediately drew fire from
environmentalists.
The Environmental Protection Agency, which announced the new rules, said they would
help reduce pollution by allowing older coal-fired power plants to be refurbished
without being subject to stricter standards of new facilities.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said the existing rules, while intended to curb
pollution, in fact had the opposite effect by discouraging owners of power plants
from making any upgrades or improvements.
Fleischer said President George W Bush "believes that, as a result of the actions
announced today, it will lead to less pollution in the air".
Bush, who was asked by a reporter about critics of the plan who said it would
increase pollution, said, "They're absolutely wrong. The resource review reforms,
coupled with the (proposed) Clear Skies legislation, will reduce pollution by
approximately 70 per cent. This administration is committed to clean air, and we're
going to work vigorously to achieve clean air."
EPA Administrator Christie Whitman said the new rules would "encourage emissions
reductions" and "has broad-based support".
She said that the existing rules, known as New Source Review, "have deterred
companies from implementing projects that would increase energy efficiency and
decrease air pollution."
But Sierra Club executive director Carl Pope said the rule change is simply a
concession to industry at the expense of the environment.
"These polluters have had decades to clean up their act, but they've just dragged
their feet," the environmental group leader said.
"This announcements puts the interests of big energy companies ahead of public
health and the environment. Americans want tough enforcement of our environmental
laws, but the Bush administration is letting polluters get away red-handed."
"The plan will undermine the Clean Air Act by creating gaping new loopholes that
will allow big polluters to increase pollution," said Frank O'Donnell, executive
director of the Clean Air Trust.
Phil Clapp, president of the activist National Environmental Trust, said, "This is
the end of the Clinton administration's long attempt to force dirty coal-fired power
plants to clean up What is really amazing is that the (Bush) administration has made
this decision without calculating how much more air pollution it will mean, how many
more asthma attacks, or how many more deaths. They simply have no numbers."
The move also drew political heat, as Democratic National Committee chairman Terry
McAuliffe said, "In a dog-bites-man moment the Bush administration today sided with
the energy industry over the environment."
He added, "Last year, George Bush broke his promise to the American people to reduce
CO2 emissions. Today President Bush goes further, encouraging industry to further
pollute the air we breathe."
The American Petroleum Institute (API), an industry group, applauded the
decision.
"The administration's action ends a period of uncertainty by finalising some and
proposing other much needed regulatory changes that should allow industry to
maintain and expand facilities in a manner that benefits the environment and
consumers," API said.
"The goal should be to assure that significant changes at facilities are reviewed
for their air quality impact while not impeding normal operations. Current
interpretations of the regulations are overly stringent and can delay needed
improvements for safe and efficient plant operation. This proposal will foster
energy efficiency, plant safety and modernization of oil and natural gas
facilities," they stated.