New Delhi: The Supreme Court has ruled that state has jurisdiction to levy excise
duty on beer only after it has been brewed and become fit for human consumption and
not on the raw material used while laying down guidelines for levy of such duty.
The ruling was given by a three-judge Bench comprising Justice B N Kirpal, Justice
Shivaraj V Patil and Justice Bisheswar Prasad Singh while allowing an appeal of
Haryana government against a ruling of Punjab and Haryana High Court given on a writ
petition filed by Haryana Breweries Ltd.
The question before the apex Court was, how to determine the quantity of beer, which
is manufactured on which the excise duty is to be levied.
Referring to Section 32 of the Punjab Excise Act, Justice Kirpal, writing the
judgement for the Bench, said, "A reading of this Section leaves no manner of doubt
that the stage at which excise duty can be levied is only after the process of
manufacture has been completed and in fact it is to be levied when it is issued from
the distillery, brewery or warehouse."
Making it clear that "the tax is on the end-product and not on the raw material",
the Bench referred to the proviso of Section 32 which gave details of the manner in
which computation of the end product could be done.
In order to determine what was the quantity of beer manufactured that is fit for
human consumption, one has to compute the raw material utilised for the production
of beer after giving an allowance for wastage of seven per cent, the apex court said.
"It appears to us that the proviso to Section 32 read with Rule 35 does nothing more
than to give a rough and ready method of calculating the quantum of beer which
should have been manufactured in the normal process which is calculated on the basis
of raw material used," the Bench said.
From the records of the manufacturer, excise authorities would be able to ascertain
the quantum of raw material used, Justice Kirpal said, and added, "It is open to the
excise authorities to accept the figures indicated in the records of the
manufacturer of the total quantity of beer manufactured."
The apex Court, however, refused to accept the plea of the manufacturer that on the
figure of the manufactured beer, arrived at on the basis of the books of the
producer, an allowance for seven per cent wastage has to be given.
PTI